<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FatLossdot.com &#187; Metabolism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fatlossdot.com/tag/metabolism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fatlossdot.com</link>
	<description>Fat and Weight Loss Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lose fat by eating less? &#8211; Fat Loss Myth #2</title>
		<link>http://fatlossdot.com/2009/05/lose-fat-by-eating-less-fat-loss-myth-2/</link>
		<comments>http://fatlossdot.com/2009/05/lose-fat-by-eating-less-fat-loss-myth-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eat more]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lose fat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatlossdot.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have looked at how futile it is to dramatically reduce your calorie intake in order to lose fat in myth #1. We now know that this approach to weight loss doesn&#8217;t work. The same people that try this method though may also take the approach of myth number two. They believe that reducing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-61" title="sm-breakfast" src="http://fatlossdot.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sm-breakfast.jpg" alt="sm-breakfast" hspace="10" vspace="5" align="left" />We have looked at how futile it is to dramatically reduce your calorie intake in order to lose fat in <a href="http://fatlossdot.com/2009/05/drop-the-calories-drop-the-fat-fat-loss-myth-1/" target="_self">myth #1</a>. We now know that this approach to weight loss doesn&#8217;t work. The same people that try this method though may also take the approach of myth number two. They believe that reducing the frequency with which they eat their meals, will help them achieve fat loss. Their faulty logic assumes that they can lose weight by eating less frequently.<span id="more-246"></span></p>
<p>Actually, on the face of it, the logic doesn&#8217;t seem that faulty at all does it? If I eat fewer meals throughout the day then I will reduce the amount of calories my body takes on board. That means that my body will then have to start using up its fuel reserves which we know are stored as fat. That means I will lose fat and lose weight. In fact, you should be aiming to do the exact opposite of the above. It is certainly a good idea to alter the frequency of meals you eat during the day. However you shouldn&#8217;t reduce the frequency, you should increase it! </p>
<p>Our bodies have come to develop some very sophisticated defense mechanisms over the thousands of years we have been roaming the earth. However we have actually only been able to develop farming methods and other food production methods that allow us to have a continuous source of nutrition quite recently. In the past when we had to go out and hunt for our food it may not have been that easy to find and so we may have had to go for long<br />
periods of time with no calorie intake at all. As discussed in myth number one the defense mechanism which keeps us alive during times of starvation starts to burn fat slower and actually starts to break down our lean muscle mass as a way to obtain valuable protein. This response comes into play much quicker than you might imagine. In fact your body starts to react in this way after you have been without food for as little as three or four hours. By sticking to the regular three meals per day routine, there will be several periods during the day where your body is in defense mode. </p>
<p>In order to promote weight loss and lose fat more efficiently, the number of meals you eat throughout the day should be increased in order to maintain a higher than normal metabolism for a longer period of time. Most people would typically consume two or three meals every five to seven hours. For example you might start with breakfast at 8am followed by lunch at 1pm (5 hour gap) and an evening meal at 8pm (7 hour gap). Don&#8217;t forget there is then another 12 hour gap before you eat breakfast again. It is easy to see why you might get hungry between meals and resort to raiding the fridge for a snack. This is because your metabolism starts to drop and so does your blood sugar level.</p>
<p>But what if you were to eat smaller more regular meals throughout the day? By consuming five to seven meals every two to three hours, your body comes to believe that its food supply is plentiful. It will therefore make more energy available to you and it won&#8217;t be too concerned with storing fat or using up your lean muscle for protein. Also, by allowing your body to release more resources for use as fuel rather than storing them up as fat, you will feel more energetic throughout the day. You will also notice that any snack cravings you may have had before should also disappear as your blood sugar will be kept at more consistent and healthy levels.</p>
<p>This is “Myth #2″ in our “12 Myths of weight loss” series.  Follow the link for Myth #1 &#8211; <a href="http://fatlossdot.com/2009/05/drop-the-calories-drop-the-fat-fat-loss-myth-1/">Drop the Calories, Drop the Fat?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fatlossdot.com/2009/05/lose-fat-by-eating-less-fat-loss-myth-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Impact of Meal Frequency On Metabolism</title>
		<link>http://fatlossdot.com/2009/04/the-impact-of-meal-frequency-on-metabolism/</link>
		<comments>http://fatlossdot.com/2009/04/the-impact-of-meal-frequency-on-metabolism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermic effect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weightlossdot.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now we’ve all probably read or heard somewhere that if you’re trying to boost your metabolism, lose weight, and get in shape that you should ditch the decades old practice of eating three meals per day and start eating much smaller, much more frequent meals throughout the day. (The most commonly recommended number is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-204" title="cheeseburger" src="http://weightlossdot.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/cheeseburger.jpg" alt="cheeseburger" width="120" height="73" align="left" />By now we’ve all probably read or heard somewhere that if you’re trying to boost your metabolism, lose weight, and get in shape that you should ditch the decades old practice of eating three meals per day and start eating much smaller, much more frequent meals throughout the day. (The most commonly recommended number is six meals a day – small ones, of course.) However, many of us are unclear on how or why this is actually supposed to help us reach our goals, and how do we really know it will help us reach our goals at all? Let’s take a look at the facts and see if we can’t find out.<br />
<span id="more-203"></span><br />
The general idea we normally hear presented to back up the recommendation for eating 6 smaller, more frequent meals a day is this. Supposedly doing this helps to keep the metabolic fires burning, resulting in more fat being burned and more pounds ultimately lost. It is also supposed to help keep blood sugar levels even, thus reducing food cravings. This revolves around a little concept called the thermic effect of food (or TEF), which is an important factor when it comes to assessing what your metabolic rate is going to be for a given period of time.</p>
<p>TEF refers to the small spike in metabolism that occurs each time you sit down and consume a meal, whether it’s big or small. All foods cost your body to expend energy just through the simple act of digesting and processing them, and this process is where the metabolic spike comes from. Different types of food require different amounts of energy to process them. (Proteins require the most energy to digest, while fats and carbohydrates require the least, which is one of several reasons why a diet high in protein and low in carbs and/or fats is recommended for loss of body fat.)</p>
<p>The general assumption is that eating several smaller meals a day causes more spikes in metabolism, thus resulting in more calories burned at the end of the day. However, this is not entirely true. TEF is not something that is constant or the same every time. It’s not only proportionate to the types of food consumed, as mentioned above, but also to the number of calories consumed, so a 2000 calorie diet consumed in 6 or 7 sittings is actually not going to amount to more energy expended through TEF than it would if it were consumed over 3 sittings, making some of what is commonly believed about eating more frequent meals a myth.</p>
<p>However, there are other benefits to eating smaller, more frequent meals. It does help keep blood sugar levels more even, which can help you maintain a more consistent energy level, and it is certainly a better, more efficient way to tackle diets that require the consumption of an unusually high number of calories, such as the ones that body builders or athletes need in order to maintain their weights and energy levels. However, making time to sit down that many times a day is often inconvenient for the average person. If this is the case, then stick with three meals a day, or whatever works best for you.</p>
<p>When it comes to maintaining optimal levels of fat burning, the focus is more effectively placed on the types of food consumed as previously mentioned. Make sure that however many meals a day you consume, that protein intake is emphasized over that of fats, carbs, or sugars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fatlossdot.com/2009/04/the-impact-of-meal-frequency-on-metabolism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

